Special Needs Patients For Dental Treatment - 1895 Words

Sedating Special Needs Patients for Dental Treatment â€Å"Too many times we see special needs patients who have been held down, papoosed and head-boarded while receiving brief treatment at other offices. While we understand that the care of these individuals can be challenging, they shouldn’t be shortchanged by a quick cleaning, no x-rays or an extraction instead of saving a tooth because that office can’t stabilize the individual in a comfortable and humane fashion.† (Dr.Kaminski) Patients with disabilities and special needs deserve the same kind of dental care as a patient who does not. Special needs patients require more care and attention than patients that do not have special needs or disabilities. Patients with medical conditions that†¦show more content†¦Patients with physical or mental disabilities should be sedated in order for them to get the proper dental care that they need because they may not be able to cooperate during the procedure. As stated by Dr.Bain, D.D.S, Patients with medical condit ions such as Down’s syndrome and cerebral palsy may have physical limitations that keep them from sitting comfortably in the patient chair and staying still during dental treatment. Patients with physical disabilities may have a hard time remaining calm. The physical disability of the special needs patient may cause them to fidget and move around a lot. This can make it more difficult for them to keep their head straight or their mouth open for the dentist. In addition, patients that lack good communication skills may also have a hard time cooperating with treatment because they are unable to communicate to the dental staff or their caregiver any discomfort or pain they feel during treatment. This makes it harder for the dentist to complete the treatment correctly because the patient may have a difficult time informing their needs to the dentist or the assistant. As a result, the patient will not be able to cooperate with treatment if they are experiencing pain or discomfort . If the patient can not communicate to the dental staff that something is causing them pain or discomfort the patient is not only going to be very uncomfortable, but they are also going to remember the procedure as a traumatic

Descartes and Hume A Look at Skepticism and Finding...

Renà © Descartes was a skeptic, and thus he believed that in order for something to be considered a true piece of knowledge, that â€Å"knowledge must have a certain stability,† (Cottingham 21). In his work, Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes concludes that in order to achieve this stability, he must start at the foundations for all of his opinions and find the basis of doubt in each of them. David Hume, however, holds a different position on skepticism in his work An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, for he criticizes Descartes’ claim because â€Å"‘it is impossible,’† (qtd. in Cottingham 35). Both philosophers show distinct reasoning in what skepticism is and how it is useful in finding stability. Descartes begins the excerpt by†¦show more content†¦This then leads him to question the existence of God, and then whether he himself truly exists as well. Descartes concludes his claim in stating, â€Å"So after considering ever ything very thoroughly, I must finally conclude that this proposition, I am, I exist, is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind,† (25). Therefore, in spite of everything he is skeptical of, Descartes manages to believe that his true existence is not something worthy of doubt. David Hume’s approach to skepticism is very different from Descartes’ ideas, mainly because he believes that it is not good to become skeptical of everything. Hume feels that there are two different types of skepticism: the type the Descartes follows, known as the â€Å"antecedent† skepticism that involves doubting everything, and moderate skepticism, which Hume feels is the more reasonable form (Hume 36). Hume feels that antecedent skepticism is pointless, and that by simply doubting everything, one is not able to find an answer to what they are looking for because they may never be satisfied with any form of validity. However, Hume feels that mode rate skepticism is â€Å"a necessary preparative to the study of philosophy, by preserving a proper impartiality in our judgements, and weaning our mind from all those prejudices, which we may have imbibed from education or rash opinion,† (Hume 36). In other words, Hume is saying that moderate skepticism is necessaryShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pages†¢ What Are the Consequences of Trust? 390 Leading for the Future: Mentoring 391 Mentoring 391 Challenges to the Leadership Construct 393 Leadership as an Attribution 393 †¢ Substitutes for and Neutralizers of Leadership 394 †¢ Online Leadership 395 Finding and Creating Effective Leaders 396 Selecting Leaders 396 †¢ Training Leaders 396 CONTENTS xv Summary and Implications for Managers 397 S A S A L L Self-Assessment Library What’s My Leadership Style? 368 Self-Assessment Library What’s

Stanford Prison Experiment free essay sample

Diana Baumrind’s Review on Obedience Experiments from Stanley Milgram In Diana Baumrind’s â€Å"Review on Obedience Experiments from Stanley Milgram, she asserted that his experiments were unethical in its procedure. She also states the main idea that the variables in the experiments could have affected their results of obedience. Baumrind points out that there should have been more and better steps in having safer tests in protecting the test subjects. She introduces her argument by pointing out the subjects of the Milgram’s experiment were in their belief that the â€Å"experimenter†. The meaning of the â€Å"experimenter† is that he or she is in authority of everything and deserves respect and should be reliable. â€Å"Milgram does not appear suited to the objectives of the study because it does not take into account the special quality of the set which the subject has in the experimental situation (p. 228). † This states that in a laboratory is not the right setting for this type of experiment for obedience. We will write a custom essay sample on Stanford Prison Experiment or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page That’s the main problem. Baumrind suggested that Stanley Milgram’s tests on the experimenters could be harmful; mentally not physically. Also she believes the level of obedience in the experiments is unrelated to regular situations in obedience and authority. The setting of Milgram’s experiment was uncomfortable and the atmosphere was not right, the results were not effective to real-life situations, Baumrind points out. In stricter circumstances and setting the subjects seems to re-act better then lower severe situations. She lacks information about the subjects being uncomfortable and not feeling right in the laboratory, as well the feelings while being tested in the lab. She makes an intelligent remark, when she explains about the Hitler’s Germany and Milgram’s experiment together. â€Å"But the parallel between authority-subordinate relationships in Hitlers Germany and in Milgram’s laboratory is unclear (228). † Milgrams conclusion cannot easily be applied to real life. Hitler’s guards were commanded to kill anyone that Hitler ordered them to. The guards that were ordered to kill, they did not question those orders, may be in their minds they did but, the guards did what guards were supposed to do, kill. The officers were acting according to their beliefs, which were that they thought the Jews were subhuman. That meant they were unaccountable for their doings. Baumrind’s logic is not strong, for there are other reasons why the SS officers did what they did. Hitler’s Germany and Milgram’s experiment tie together pretty well. Baumrind, she puts this information in to show the hideous nature of humans, and their actions of authority. She is not missing Milgram’s main point, she disagree with his main point. She uses good grammar, used the correct in-text citations, uses of transitions well between paragraphs, and does not leap to conclusions right away. She spread, out everything; it was precise, has good back up evidence to prove her thesis statement and points of Milgram’s experiment. Baumrind’s disagreement with Milgram’s process and with his conclusion is a key point. The author gave a well done explanation on everything she just forgot to mention the subject’s viewpoints, and forgot to back up a few things, which weakness the article. Baumrind claimed that this Milgram experiment should not be done, it was a risky test, and different reactions towards the subjects could have been because they were in a laboratory. Lastly, Baumrind points out â€Å"Milgram’s experimental situations are not sufficiently accurate models of real-life experience†, Baumrind would not like to see future experiments that can affect people’s life.

Prehistoric Barrows found in the Stonehenge Landscape

Location of Prehistoric Barrows The spectacular prehistoric barrows found within Stonehenge landscape remain important historical sites with a tangible archeological significance to the present world (Chippindale 1994, p.24). To visit the prehistoric site one has to take a train or a bus to easily get to the Stonehenge prehistoric site as seen in figure 1.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Prehistoric Barrows found in the Stonehenge Landscape specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Fig.1 Stonehenge as taken from balloon in 1906 Adopted from English Heritage Photo Library J050113 On arrival, one can see the car park which is the landing point for all visitors. It is a paid parking place during the high season, especially from June till August. The parking fee is waived for visitors with membership cards; otherwise the cash payment is made to car park attendants. There comes the better part of site adventures behind the c ar park Stonehenge as a world heritage site is well endowed with both long and round barrows that are within walking distance from the car park. From a close look, one can see round and long barrows that were excavated in the 19th century by archeologists Cunnington and Sir Richard Colt. Through barrows’ exaction, they reveal the Stonehenge site as an important burial landscape existing for about one thousand years. However, it requires a keen observation to recognize bronze aged round barrows because of ploughing activities.Advertising Looking for essay on archeology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The long barrows The long barrows are the most ancient burial mounds that can be spotted in Stonehenge that were used for the purpose of communal burial. The long barrows are easily distinguished by their rectangular shape with the length of about 99 feet with chalk vertical walls. The excavation reveals bones of buried peo ple looking eastwards but some parts were removed probably for ancestral worship [see figure fig.2]. Fig.2 long barrows standing Round Barrows The round barrows represent circular barrows that were built during the Bronze Age with aim to bury community leaders. The round barrows are categorized into cemeteries and kings barrows that enhanced usage of barrows for many years. Walking through the field, one notices a number of round barrows which can be classified according to their shape (Chippindale 1994, p.47). There are round barrows known as bowls that have a ditch and a mound and ditch. Additionally, there are bell and disc barrows that have a bank, central mound and a circular ditch (Flinders-Petrie 1880, p.58). Most people buried in round barrows had their grave goods that are instrumental distinguishing between a female from male person. The types are well illustrated below in figure 6 and 7. Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Prehistoric Barrows found in the Stonehenge Landscape specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Fig. 6 types of round Fig.7 bush barrows Kings barrows Kings barrows show cemeteries that are located on the ridge of the eastern Stonehenge that include 14 burial mounds (Stukeley 1740, p.49). The kings barrow can be seen in terms of new and old king barrows. Kings barrows can be clearly seen in figure 3 and 4 below. Fig.3 kings barrows viewed in the snow adopted from English Heritage NMR, DP136315 Advertising Looking for essay on archeology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Fig.4 Fig.3 kings barrows viewed in the snow The Cursus The Cursus lies to the west of Stonehenge making a rectangular earthwork running 1.8 miles towards west-east alignment (Richards 2007, p.19). The Cursus has a width of about 100 metres -130 metres with ditches outward as shown in figure 5. Fig. 5 cursus Therefore, Stonehenge prehistoric site is a world heritage characterized by its monuments that marked the developed technology and creative achievements of people in the ancient times (Heck 2007, p.92). In addition to that, Stonehenge site is still important as illustration and input to monument construction. Reference List Chippindale, C 1994. Stonehenge Complete, Thames and Hudson, London. Chippindale, C 1994. Stonehenge, Thames and Hudson, London. Flinders-Petrie, W M 1880. Stonehenge: plans, description and theories, Stanford, London. Heck, C 2007. â€Å"A new medieval view of Stonehenge†, British Archaeology, Jan/Feb 2007, p. 92. Richards, J 2007. Stonehenge: the St ory so far, English Heritage, London. Keley, W 1740. Stonehenge, a temple restor’d to the British Druids, W. Innys and R. Manby, London. This essay on Prehistoric Barrows found in the Stonehenge Landscape was written and submitted by user Kason W. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.